This is the first article in a new series, News Reflections, here on The Silver Mirror. When we see something intriguing coming down the wire, we give some commentary, weigh pros and cons, wag a prophetic finger if necessary. Expect updates bi-weekly, Wednesday and Friday.
First up, thanks to Collider, we have the news that executive producer Christopher Nolan is stepping away from active involvement in the ‘Superman’ reboot to focus on directing ‘The Dark Knight Rises’.
This leaves the reboot entirely in Zack Snyder’s hands. Yes, we knew this would happen eventually. Somebody has to take the reins.
Superman, as I expressed in my review of the 1978 classic, is heroic idealism anthropomorphized. He’s the guy who always wins, and he’s such a swell guy, too. Also in my review, I directly contrasted him with Alan Moore’s cynical, nihilistic ‘Watchmen’ and its film adaptation, directed by Snyder. I do find it amusing that Snyder, responsible for bringing Superman’s antithesis to the screen, is now interpreting the Big Blue Boy Scout for a new generation. I don’t want to imply that Zack Snyder is the wrong man for the job. He’s got a brilliant visual sensibility and manages to get believable emotions out of actors working in an effects-heavy environment. My fear is, because he shows more affection for gritty, postmodern graphic novels than the optimistic pre-Cold War comic books of Superman’s heyday, he may not succeed in communicating the character’s essence. Not being familiar with the gamut of Superman’s run in print, my main reference points are in film, particularly the superb Max Fleischer cartoons and the Richard Donner classic. Getting to the point, I must confess my bias is towards the Fleischer cartoons and their pliable, World-of-Tomorrow aesthetic, and I have no wish to see a cynical, brutal re-imagining of the childhood icon.
The World’s Fair-inspired art in the 40’s cartoons has thematic resonance with the character’s soul. Superman is sometimes aptly named the Man of Tomorrow. He represents what the artists believe is best in humanity and what will allow us to flourish in an uncertain, often dangerous world defined by technological innovation. It’s an important symbol, what with humankind evolving into a hybrid race with the digital world, eerily close to the predictions of such novelists as William Gibson. It makes sense that Lex Luthor, the evil, ambitious businessman, is the most popular villain in Superman’s canon. He represents innovation, spurred by capitalism, gone amuck. Lex is the cynic. Superman is the optimist.
Does Zack Snyder understand Superman? Can he rightfully interpret the character, as Christopher Nolan promised, in a modern context? We won’t know until the film plays in 2012. There’s a lot on Snyder’s shoulders now. He could either inspire a generation, or drag it further into the muck. With the future coming faster than ever, we can’t afford the latter.